黏膜支持式导板应用于无牙颌种植治疗的研究进展

李莹莹,郭慧颖,袁长永

中国校医 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9) : 712-715,720.

PDF(1557 KB)
PDF(1557 KB)
中国校医 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (9) : 712-715,720.
综述与讲座

黏膜支持式导板应用于无牙颌种植治疗的研究进展

作者信息 +

Research progress in application of mucosa-supported guide plate in edentulous implant therapy

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目前,数字化导板广泛应用于口腔种植手术。相较于传统手术,应用数字化导板使术前设计更为直观、术中定位更为精准、术后对比更为便捷,从而提升了口腔种植术的准确性。对于无牙颌患者,最常用的数字化导板是黏膜支持式导板。本文旨在阐述黏膜支持式导板在无牙颌种植中的应用,对其优势、制作流程以及临床应用流程进行简介,并分析了临床医生应该如何提高黏膜支持式导板应用于无牙颌种植的精确度,希望能为临床应用提供帮助。 

Abstract

At present, digital guide plate is widely used in oral implant surgery. Compared with traditional surgery, the application of digital guide plates makes preoperative design more intuitive, intraoperative positioning more accurate, and postoperative comparison more convenient, thus improving the accuracy of oral implant surgery. For edentulous patients, the most commonly used digital guide plate is the mucosa-supported guide plate. The purpose of this article is to describe the application of mucosa-supported guide plates in edentulous implants, introduce its advantages, manufacturing process, and clinical application process, and analyze how clinicians should improve the accuracy of mucosa-supported guide plates in edentulous implants, hoping to provide help for clinical application.

关键词

数字化导板 / 黏膜支持式 / 无牙颌种植

Key words

Digital guide plate / Mucosa-supported / Edentulous implant

引用本文

导出引用
李莹莹, 郭慧颖, 袁长永. 黏膜支持式导板应用于无牙颌种植治疗的研究进展[J]. 中国校医, 2023, 37(9): 712-715,720
LI Yingying, GUO Huiying, YUAN Changyong. Research progress in application of mucosa-supported guide plate in edentulous implant therapy[J]. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 2023, 37(9): 712-715,720
中图分类号: R783   

参考文献

[1] 王兴.第四次全国口腔健康流行病学调查报告[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:114-116.
[2] 许伟伟,单显峰,管庆华,等.牙列缺损应用口腔种植牙修复与常规修复治疗的临床效果比较[J].中国实用医药,2022,17(22):84-86.
[3] Van Assche N,Vercruyssen M,Coucke W,et al. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement[J].Clin Oral Implants Res,2012,23:112-123.
[4] Turbush SK,Turkyilmaz I.Accuracy of three different types of stereo-lithographic surgical guide in implant placement:an in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent,2012,108 (3):181-188.
[5] Raico Gallardo YN,da Silva-Olivio IRT,Mukai E,et al. Accuracycomparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to thetissue of support:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].ClinOral Implants Res,2017,28(5):602-612.
[6] Shen P,Zhao J,Fan L,et al. Accuracy evaluation of computer-designed surgical guide template in oral implantology[J]. J Cranio-maxillofac Surg,2015,43(10):2189-2194.
[7] 刘劭晨,李红霞,郭航,等.数字化导板在口腔种植临床应用中的精确度分析[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2022,6(12):49-52.
[8] Schimmel M,Müller F,Suter V,et al. Implants for elderly patients[J].Periodontol 2000,2017,73(1):228-240.
[9] 张健,王庆福,王艳颖,等.口腔种植与精密修复 数字化导板在口腔种植中的应用[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2014,7(3):129-133.
[10] 李冀寅,贺平.自体牙骨移植材料在牙槽骨缺损修复中的应用进展[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(3):212-214.
[11] 杨凯文,刘艾芃,王晓华,等.水平骨量不足情况下种植牙的研究进展[J].医学综述,2020,26(22):4450-4456.
[12] Lambert FE,Lecloux G,Grenade C,et al. Less invasive surgicalprocedures using narrow-diameter implants:a prospective studyin 20 consecutive patients[J]. J Oral Implantol,2015,41(6):693-699.
[13] Naziri E,Schramm A,Wilde F. Accuracy of computer-assistedimplant placement with insertion templates[J].GMS InterdiscipPlast Reconstr Surg DGPW,2016,5:1-16.
[14] Schnutenhaus S,Brunken L,Edelmann C,et al. Alveolar ridgepreservation and primary stability as influencing factors on thetransfer accuracy of static guided implant placement:a prospectiveclinical trial[J]. BMC Oral Health,2020,20(1):1-11.
[15] Vercruyssen M,Hultin M,Van Assche N,et al. Guided surgery:accuracy and efficacy[J].Periodontol 2000,2014,66(1):228-246.
[16] 武婧,李文晋.口腔金属修复材料对磁共振图像和锥形束CT图像伪影的影响[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(49):23-24.
[17] Dreiseidler T,Neugebauer J,Ritter L,et al. Accuracy of a newlydeveloped integrated system for dental implant planning[J].ClinOral Implants Res,2009,20(11):1191-1199.
[18] Cassetta M,Di Mambro A,Giansanti M,et al. Is it possible toimprove the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithogra-phic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanicalcomponents-[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2013,42(7):887-890.
[19] Van Assche N,Van Steenberghe D,Quirynen M,et al. Accuracyassessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement inpartial edentulism[J]. J Clin Periodontol,2010,37(4):398-403.
[20] Mai HN,Lee DH. Effects of supporting conditions and anchormicroscrew on the stabilization of the implant guide templateduring the drilling process: An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent,2020,124(6):727.
[21] Abduo J,Lau D. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implantplacement in anterior and posterior sites by clinicians new toimplant dentistry:in vitro comparison of fully guided,pilot-guided,and freehand protocols[J].Int J Implant Dent,2020,6(1):1-13.
[22] Zhou W,Liu Z,Song L,et al.Clinical factors affecting the accuracyof guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Evid Based Dent Pract,2018,18(1):28-40.
[23] Younes F,Cosyn J,De Bruyckere T,et al.A randomized controlledstudy on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fullyguided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients[J]. J ClinPeriodontol,2018,45(6):721-732.
[24] Lou F,Rao P,Zhang M,et al. Accuracy evaluation of partiallyguided and fully guided templates applied to implant surgery ofanterior teeth:a randomized controlled trial[J].Clin Implant DentRelat Res,2021,23(1):117-130.
[25] Vinci R,Manacorda M,Abundo R,et al. Accuracy of edentulouscomputer-aided implant surgery as compared to virtual planning:a retrospective multicenter study[J]. J Clin Med,2020,9(3):774.
[26] Kivovics M,Pénzes D,Németh O,et al. The influence of surgicalexperience and bone density on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws using a mucosa-supported surgical template with a half-guided implant placementprotocol-a randomized clinical study[J].Materials,2020,13(24):5759.
[27] Arisan V,Karabuda ZC,Pi-kin B,et al. Conventional multi-slicecomputed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) forcomputer-aided implant placement. Part II: Reliability of mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides[J].Clin Implant Dent RelatRes,2013,15(6):907-917.
[28] Ochi M,Kanazawa M,Sato D,et al. Factors affecting accuracy ofimplant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographicsurgical guides in edentulous mandibles[J].Comput Biol Med,2013,43(11):1653-1660.
[29] Cassetta M,Di Mambro A,Giansanti M,et al. The intrinsic error ofa stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2013,42(2):264-275.
[30] Rungcharassaeng K,Caruso JM,Kan JYK,et al. Accuracy ofcomputer-guided surgery:A comparison of operator experience[J].J Prosthet Dent,2015,114(3):407-413.
[31] Lin CC,Ishikawa M,Huang BH,et al. In vitro accuracy of staticguided implant surgery measured by optical scan:Examining theimpact of operator experience[J].Applied Sciences,2020,10(8):2718.

PDF(1557 KB)

413

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/