2017—2020年山东某高校水痘疫情流行及危险因素研究

李芬,许英顺,张琳,曹申梅,许茜茜

中国校医 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 495-499.

PDF(1195 KB)
PDF(1195 KB)
中国校医 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7) : 495-499.
疾病控制

2017—2020年山东某高校水痘疫情流行及危险因素研究

作者信息 +

Study on epidemic situation and risk factors of varicella in a university in Shandong Province from 2017 to 2020

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 分析大学生水痘流行病学特征及相关危险因素,为高校大学生水痘的预防控制提供理论依据。方法 以2017年—2020年山东某高校确诊的大学生水痘患者为基础,采用描述性流行病学方法分析大学生水痘的流行特点,并采用病例对照研究方法,调查病例组、对照组研究对象的基本情况及相关影响因素,采用单因素及多因素logistic回归分析大学生水痘发病的危险因素。结果 2017年1月—2020年12月共确诊水痘学生198人,发病率为1.50 ‰;其中,2018年发病率最高(2.36‰),2020年度发病率最低(0.90‰),各年度发病率差异有统计学意义(χ2=32.003,P<0.001)。水痘发病月分布分析发现,水痘发病较多的月份依次为12月(27.27%)、11月(25.25%)、4月(13.13%),发病较少的月份为8月(0.00%)、7月(1.01%),2月(1.52%)。确诊水痘学生中,散发病例79例(39.90%),聚集/暴发病例119例(60.10%);共发生聚集/暴发77起。接种疫苗者(突破病例)64例(32.32%),未接种疫苗(无免疫史)者134例(67.68%);且突破病例体温≥38.5 ℃及发热比例均明显低于无免疫史病例,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=7.110,P=0.008;χ2=9.188,P=0.002);皮疹<50个比例明显高于无免疫史患者,差异有统计学意义(χ2=25.877,P<0.001);皮疹结痂时间明显缩短,差异有统计学意义[(6.04±4.08) vs (8.12±5.46),t=2.707,P=0.044]。对水痘发病危险因素进行分析发现,水痘病例接触史(OR=16.494)、带状疱疹病例接触史(OR=5.680)、医院暴露史(OR=3.655)及洗手频率(≤5次/天)(OR=3.216)是水痘发病的危险性因素(均P<0.05);接种过水痘疫苗(OR=0.418)、选修传染病健康教育课/参加传染病健康教育讲座(OR=0.704)是水痘发病的保护性因素(均P<0.05)。结论 大学生水痘发病率较高,且多数病例为聚集/暴发发病;控制大学校园水痘发病,除提高水痘疫苗接种率,还应加强手卫生及传染病健康教育宣传,注重密闭空间的通风和消毒。 

Abstract

Objective To analyze the epidemiological characteristics and related risk factors of varicella in college students so as to provide theoretical evidences for prevention and control of varicella in college students. Methods Based on the college students with varicella diagnosed definitely in a university in Shandong Province from 2017 to 2020, the epidemic characteristics of college students' varicella were analyzed by the descriptive epidemiological method, and the basic situation and related influencing factors of the subjects in the case group and control group were investigated by a case-control research method. The risk factors of college students' varicella were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results From January 2017 to December 2020, 198 students were diagnosed as varicella, with the incidence rate of 1.50 ‰. The incidence rate was the highest in 2018 (2.36‰), and the incidence rate was the lowest in 2020 (0.90‰), and the difference was statistically significant among each year (χ2=32.003, P<0.001). The monthly distribution analysis of varicella showed that the months with more varicella were December (27.27%), November (25.25%), and April (13.13%), and the months with less varicella were August (0.00%), July (1.01%), and February (1.52%). Among the students diagnosed with varicella, 79 cases (39.90%) were sporadic and 119 cases (60.10%) were aggregation/outbreak. A total of 77 aggregation/outbreaks occurred. Among all the cases, 64 cases (32.32%) were vaccinated (breakthrough cases), and 134 cases (67.68%) were not vaccinated (no immunization history). The body temperature≥38.5℃ and the pro-portion of fever in breakthrough cases were significantly lower than those in cases without immune history, and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=7.110, P=0.008; χ2=9.188, P=0.002). The proportion of rashes<50 in the breakthrough cases was significantly higher than that of patients without immune history, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=25.877, P<0.001). In addition, the crusting time of rash of the breakthrough cases was significantly shorter than that of the patients without immune history, and the difference was statistically significant [(6.04±4.08) d vs. (8.12±5.46) d, t=2.707, P=0.044). By analyzing the risk factors of varicella, it was found that the contact history of varicella cases (OR=16.494), the contact history of herpes zoster cases (OR=5.680), hospital exposure history (OR=3.655) and hand washing frequency (≤ 5 times/day) (OR=3.216) were the risk factors of varicella (all I<0.05). Vaccination with varicella vaccine (OR=0.418), and elective infectious disease health education courses/attending infectious disease health education lectures (OR=0.704) were the protective factors of varicella (both P<0.05). Conclusions The incidence rate of varicella in college students is relatively high, and most cases are due to clusters/outbreaks. In order to control the incidence of varicella in university campus, we should not only improve the vaccination rate of varicella vaccine, but also strengthen the hand hygiene and infectious disease health education and publicity, and pay attention to the ventilation and disinfection of confined space.

关键词

水痘 / 大学生 / 突破病例 / 危险因素

Key words

varicella / college student / breakthrough case / risk factor

引用本文

导出引用
李芬, 许英顺, 张琳, . 2017—2020年山东某高校水痘疫情流行及危险因素研究[J]. 中国校医, 2022, 36(7): 495-499
LI Fen, XU Ying-shun, ZHANG Lin, et al. Study on epidemic situation and risk factors of varicella in a university in Shandong Province from 2017 to 2020[J]. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 2022, 36(7): 495-499
中图分类号: R511.5   

参考文献

[1] 徐远平,耿健.某高校2010-2015年学生传染病流行情况分析[J].现代医学与健康研究电子杂志,2018,2(6):153,155.
[2] 关欣,韩冰,门路,等.高校2014-2018年学生呼吸道传染病发病特点分析[J].中国卫生产业,2020,17(10):191-193.
[3] 于彩云.某高校2009-2010年学生因病缺课系统传染病监测结果分析[J].中国学校卫生,2013,34(6):744-745,747.
[4] 张敏,朱海阳,李金旗,等.2013-2019年宁夏学校传染病突发公共卫生事件流行特征分析[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(6):981-984.
[5] 赵杰强,周广华,刘爽.北京某大学水痘疫情流行病学分析及预防控制对策[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2014,24(2):416-417,423.
[6] 石翠翠,朱旻,张莉华.2015-2018年某高校学生水痘流行病学特征分析[J].中国校医,2021,35(4):257-258,312.
[7] 谢小琴,马文.2010-2019年重庆市北碚区水痘流行病学特征分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2021,37(5):643-646.
[8] 赵红平,郑敏,伍凤云,等.2010-2019年江西省水痘流行病学特征分析[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(7):1156-1159.
[9] 国家卫生健康委员会疾病预防控制局.2020年全国法定传染病疫情概况[J].中国病毒病杂志,2021,11(2):111.
[10] 丁哲渊,吴昊澄,鲁琴宝,等.2020年浙江省法定传染病疫情分析[J].预防医学,2021,33(4):325-331.
[11] 张云娜,吕强,李蔚,等.2020年四川省法定传染病疫情分析[J].预防医学情报杂志,2021,37(5):621-628.
[12] 梁亚荣,朱香英,程红霞.某高校2007-2015年大学生传染病疫情特征分析[J].中国学校卫生,2017,38(5):791-793.
[13] 陈晶,周蔓,门志红.2013-2018年北京市西城区水痘流行特征及疫情预测[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2019,30(3):118-121.
[14] 张小平,许二萍,许玉洋,等.杭州市2012-2017年学校水痘聚集性疫情分析[J].中国学校卫生,2018,39(11):1708-1710.
[15] 叶玲,吴奕晨,龚丽芬.河源市2015-2019年水痘聚集性疫情流行特征[J].海峡预防医学杂志,2021,27(2):53-54.
[16] 贺晴,李美霞,许建雄,等. 2013-2018年广州市学校和托幼机构水痘聚集性疫情的流行病学分析[J].实用预防医学,2021,28(1):32-35.
[17] 高丽,陈爱女,陈子萌,等.水痘突破病例流行病学特征及其危险因素研究综述[J].疾病监测,2013,28(7):603-605.
[18] 蒋静凤,王旭雯.无锡2017-2018年儿童水痘疫情中突破性病例分析[J].中国学校卫生,2020,41(8):1253-1255.
[19] 赵春艳,张国峰,张玲,等. 2013-2017年北京市通州区不同剂次水痘疫苗免疫史突破病例特征分析[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2020,40(2):136-139.
[20] 李娜,冯雪英,孙源,等.烟台市15岁以下儿童水痘发病特征及危险因素分析[J].现代预防医学,2018,45(9):1581-1584.
[21] 方芳芳,周刚,梁永斌,等.1起幼儿园水痘暴发调查及疫苗保护效果分析[J].江苏预防医学,2021,32(2):193-194,199.
[22] Yasui Y,Mitsui T,Arima F,et al. Changes in epidemiological char-acteristics and sero-prevalence against the varicella zoster virus inschool-age children after the introduction of a national immunizationprogram in Japan[J]. Hum Vaccin Immunother,2021,17(8):2494-2500.

基金

山东省人文社会科学课题(2021-ZXXA-02)

PDF(1195 KB)

258

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/