Efficacy of small incision proximal antirotation intramedullary nailing in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of femur

BAI Wei, WANG Jian-jian, WANG Zhen-hao

Chinese Journal of School Doctor ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10) : 776-778,782.

PDF(1201 KB)
PDF(1201 KB)
Chinese Journal of School Doctor ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10) : 776-778,782.
Aticle

Efficacy of small incision proximal antirotation intramedullary nailing in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of femur

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To investigate the efficacy and postoperative safety of small incision proximal femoral nail internal fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture. Methods From June 2015 to October 2019, in our hospital, 150 patients with intertrochanteric fracture were selected as the research objects, and according to the stochastic indicator method, they were divided into a small incision group (75 cases) and a control group (75 cases). The patients in the control group received the proximal femoral reconstruction nail fixation treatment, and the patients in the small incision group were given the small incision proximal femur intramedullary nail fixation treatment. The clinical curative effects, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, bed activity time and hospital stay, the VAS scores, Harris scores, and the incidence of complications of the two groups were observed and compared between the two groups. Results The effective rate of the small incision group was 96.00%, higher than that of the control group (90.67%), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=8.917, P=0.012). In the small incision group, the operative time , intraoperative blood loss , the time of getting out of bed and the hospitalization time were all lower than those in the control group , and the differences were statistically significant (t=18.53, 33.64, 19.24, 18.07, all P<0.01). there="" were="" no="" significant="" differences="" in="" the="" average="" preoperative="" vas="" score="" and="" harris="" score="" between="" the="" two="" groups="" both="" p="">0.05). After the treatment, the average VAS score of the small incision group (2.42±0.74) was lower than that of the control group (4.68±0.98), and the Harris score of the small incision group (86.34±12.11) was higher than that of the control group (78.51±10.69), and the differences were statistically significant (both P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the small incision group was 4.00%, which was lower than that in the control group (14.67%, χ2=5.042, P=0.025). Conclusion The small incision proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail internal fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of femur has a significant effect, which can significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten the length of hospitalization, improve hip joint function, and it also has fewer complications. Therefore, it is worthy of further clinical research.

Key words

internal fixation of proximal femur with small incision and anti-rotation intramedullary nail / internal fixation with reconstruction screw of proximal femur / intertrochanteric fracture of femur / security / clinical curative effect

Cite this article

Download Citations
BAI Wei, WANG Jian-jian, WANG Zhen-hao. Efficacy of small incision proximal antirotation intramedullary nailing in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures of femur[J]. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 2021, 35(10): 776-778,782

References

[1] 许汉权,李彩华.老年骨质疏松性粗隆间骨折的治疗[J].广东医学,2018,39(20):3051-3054.
[2] 张文昌.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定对股骨粗隆间骨折老年患者术后髋关节功能及生活质量的影响[J].中国药物与临床,2018,18(6):976-978.
[3] 周跃江,包洪卫,王海红,等.小切口股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折[J].中国微创外科杂志,2016,16(4):344-346.
[4] 石勇,陈子健,洪泽亚,等.三种内固定方法治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床价值对比分析[J].创伤外科杂志,2017,19(10):789-790.
[5] 张麟云,费青,王欧.股骨颈锁定钢板内固定治疗合并高股骨前弓的股骨粗隆间骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2018,33(10):1065-1067.
[6] 韩冰,刘宏滨,张传开,等. PFNA、锁定钢板、人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(4):379-381.
[7] 陈祥.微创 PFNA 内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床研究[J].现代诊断与治疗,2018,29(21):3394-3396.
[8] 吕向伟,李国庆. PFNA 内固定术对股骨粗隆间骨折伴股骨颈骨折患者的疗效[J].临床医学研究与实践,2018,3(22):60-61,64.
[9] 陈灿,马家富,陈秋萍.小切口股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果[J].广西医学,2019,41(3):388-390.
[10] 陈超坤.动力髋螺钉治疗不同Evans分型股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效对比[J].中国校医,2016,30(3):82-83.
[11] 陈维栋.股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定术与人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者的效果[J].中国伤残医学,2018,26(21):17-19.
[12] 孙浩,卜海晶,何从科,等. 3种外科方法治疗股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2016,31(4):409-411.
[13] 张龙,申海龙,张磊.微创股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折临床分析[J].海南医学,2016,27(2):299-301.
[14] 周烨,唐淼,徐康永. PFNA与人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,34(4):376-378.
PDF(1201 KB)

190

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/