Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on maternal and infant outcomes of patients with gestational hypertension. Methods From May 2019 to December 2020, 160 pregnant women with gestational hypertension in our hospital obstetric ward were randomly divided into an intervention group (80 cases) and a control group (80 cases). The control group was given routine nursing, and the intervention group was given comprehensive nursing intervention. The incidence of maternal adverse outcomes and neonatal adverse outcomes in the two groups were compared. Results The incidences of maternal placental abruption, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, and organ function damage in the intervention group were 1.25%, 15.0%, and 5.0% respectively, which were lower than those in the control group (8.75%, 31.25%, and 15.0%), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=4.737, 5.942 and 4.444, P<0.05); the incidence of fetal growth restriction, intrauterine distress, preterm birth and neonatal asphyxia in the intervention group were 5.0%, 2.50%, 10.0%, and 1.25% respectively, which were lower than those in the control group (21.25%, 11.25%, 31.25%, and 8.75%), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=9.263, 4.783, 11.033 and 4.737, P<0.05). Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively reduce the probability of pregnancy-induced hypertension-related diseases in pregnant women, and has a positive effect on improving maternal and infant outcomes.
陈明珠,宋晴,姚慧. 综合护理干预对妊娠期高血压患者母婴结局的影响[J]. 中国校医, 2022, 36(7): 544-546.
CHEN Ming-zhu, SONG Qing, YAO Hui. Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on maternal and infant outcomes of patients with gestational hypertension. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 2022, 36(7): 544-546.
[1] Lin D,Yong J,Ni S,et al.Negative association between serum adropinand hypertensive disorders complicating pregnancy[J]. Hypertenspregnancy,2019,38(4):237-244. [2] Marozio L,Chiarle G,Filippini C,et al. Arterial stiffness in normalpregnancy at 11-13 weeks of gestation and risk of late-onsethypertensive disorders of pregnancy[J]. J Hypertens,2018,37(5):157-163. [3] Kumar N,Singh AK.Maternal serum uric acid and calcium as predi-ctors of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy:A case control study[J]. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol,2019,58(2):244-250. [4] 中华医学会妇产科学分会妊娠期高血压疾病学组.妊娠期高血压疾病诊治指南(2020)[J]. 中华妇产科杂志,2020,55(4):227-238. [5] 贺云.妊娠高血压综合征患者体内一氧化氮,内皮素-1及血清尿素氮,尿酸水平相关性分析[J]. 中国校医,2020,34(11):48-49,52. [6] Wen C,Metcalfe A,Anderson T,et al. Risks of dysglycemia overthe first four years after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy[J].Can J Diabetes,2019,43(8):772-779. [7] Alisse,Hauspurg,Malamo,et al.Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancyand Future Maternal Health:How Can the Evidence Guide Postp-artum Management-[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep,2019,21(12):1-10. [8] Benschop L,Duvekot JJ,Roeters van Lennep JE.Future risk ofcardiovascular disease risk factors and events in women after ahypertensive disorder of pregnancy[J]. Heart (BCS),2019,105(16):4199-4200. [9] Thomsen CR,Henriksen TB,Uldbjerg N,et al. Seasonal variationin the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Denmark[J]. ActaObstet Gynecol Scand,2020,99(3):344-349. [10] 吴彩霞,袁裕龙.早期综合护理干预对妊娠期高血压疾病患者血压及妊娠结局的影响价值分析[J].中外医学研究,2019,17(10):115-116. [11] 郜丽,李英.助产士综合护理对妊娠糖尿病患者的临床效果及母婴结局影响评价[J].中外女性健康研究,2022(2):145-146,189. [12] 严丽.综合护理干预对妊娠期高血压患者母婴结局的影响[J].国际护理学杂志,2016,35(23):3240-3242. [13] 陈笑清.激励式心理干预配合PDCA循环护理对妊娠期高血压患者母婴结局的影响[J].心血管病防治知识,2021,11(28):52-54. [14] Toloza FJK,Derakhshan A,M-nnist- T,et al. Association betweenmaternal thyroid function and risk of gestational hypertension andpre-eclampsia: a systematic review and individual-participant datameta-analysis[J]. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol,2022,10(4):243-252. [15] 陈淑娟.系统性护理干预对妊娠期高血压孕产妇心理应激及母婴结局的影响[J].基层医学论坛,2021,25(21):3046-3048. [16] Ouyang Y,Liu X,He Z,et al. Effect of high-quality nursing onpostpartum hemorrhage and quality of life in puerperants withgestational hypertension[J]. Am J Transl Res,2022,14(1):304-310.