离心运动与空中踏车加腹式呼吸训练对稳定期COPD患者运动能力和心肺耐力影响的比较研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1092 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的比较离心运动与空中踏车加腹式呼吸训练对稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者运动能力、心肺耐力的影响,为稳定期COPD患者的康复提供更适宜的训练技术。方法选择2019年3月—2022年3月本院收治的92例稳定期COPD患者,随机分为观察组、对照组,剔除脱落病例后,最终2组各43例纳入研究。观察组进行离心运动训练,对照组进行空中踏车+腹式呼吸训练。分别于训练前、训练后4周检测2组一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、一秒率(FEV1/FVC)、FEV1占预计值百分比(FEV1%pred)、最大自主通气量(MVV)、最大摄氧量(VO2 max)、最大公斤摄氧量(VO2 max/kg)、最大分钟通气量(VEmax)、最大心率(HRmax)、氧脉搏(O2/HR)、无氧阈(AT)、心脏指数(CI)、射血分数(EF)、心输出量(CO)、肺动脉压(PAP)水平;记录训练前、训练后2周和训练后4周2组膝关节活动度、步行速度、肌酸激酶(CK)水平;比较训练前、训练后4周2组圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分。结果训练后观察组FVC、MVV水平分别为(2.92±0.51)L、(56.81±9.06)L,对照组分别为(2.68±0.53)L、(52.75±9.33)L,差异均有统计学意义(t分别为2.140、2.047,P均<0.05);训练后观察组VO2 max、VO2 max/kg、VEmax、AT分别为(1.71±0.42)L、(23.62±4.85)mL/kg、(49.66±9.13)L、(13.86±3.28)mL/(kg·min),对照组分别为(1.53±0.36)L、(21.46±3.52)mL/kg、(45.58±9.25)L、(15.65±3.89)mL/(kg·min),差异均有统计学意义(t分别为2.134、2.364、2.059、2.307,P均<0.05);训练后2组的CI、EF、CO、PAP比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);训练后4周观察组膝关节活动度、步行速度、CK水平分别为(71.48±6.22)°、(0.75±0.09)m/s、(206.37±34.45)IU/L,对照组分别为(68.59±5.39)°、(0.62±0.22)m/s、(181.06±39.74)IU/L,差异均有统计学意义(t分别为2.303、3.586、3.156,P均<0.05);2组呼吸症状、活动能力、疾病影响评分和总分比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论离心运动训练用于COPD稳定期患者有利于改善患者的运动能力和心肺耐力,加速其康复,提高其生活质量。　

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈才煌
	吴志刚

关键词 ：肺疾病, 慢性阻塞性, 运动疗法, 运动试验, 肺功能

Abstract：Objective To compare the effects of centrifugal exercise and air treadmill combined with abdominal breathing training on the exercise ability and cardiopulmonary endurance of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and provide more suitable training techniques for the rehabilitation of patients with stable COPD. Methods Ninety-two patients with stable COPD admitted to our hospital from March 2019 to March 2022 were divided into an observation group and a control group by double-blind method. After removing shedding cases, 43 cases in each group were finally included in the study. The observation group received centrifugal exercise training, and the control group received air treadmill + abdominal breathing training. Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) in one second, forced vital capacity (FVC), one-second rate (FEV1/FVC), FEV1 percentage of the expected value (FEV1%pred), maximum autonomous ventilation volume (MVV), maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max), and maximum oxygen uptake in kilograms (VO2 max), maximum minute ventilation (VEmax), maximum heart rate (HRmax), oxygen pulse (O2/HR), anaerobic threshold (AT), cardiac index (CI), ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output (CO), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) level were detected in both groups before and 4 weeks after training, respectively. Knee joint motion, walking speed, and creatine kinase (CK) level were recorded before training, 2 weeks after training, and 4 weeks after training. St. George’s Breathing Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores were recorded for both groups before and 4 weeks after training. Results After training, the levels of FVC and MVV were (2.92±0.51) L and (56.81±9.06) L in the observation group, and (2.68±0.53) L and (52.75±9.33) L in the control group, respectively, with statistical significance (t=2.140、2.047, both P<0.05). After training, the VO2 max, VO2 max/kg, VEmax, and AT of the observation group were (1.71±0.42) L, (23.62±4.85) mL/kg, (49.66±9.13) L, and (13.86±3.28) mL/(kg·min), respectively, and those of the control group were (1.53±0.36) L, (21.46±3.52) mL/kg, (45.58±9.25) L, and (15.65±3.89) mL/(kg·min) respectively, with statistical significance (t=2.134, 2.364, 2.059, 2.307, all P<0.05). After training, there were significant differences in CI, EF, CO, and PAP between the two groups (P<0.05). Knee joint motion, walking speed, and CK level in the observation group were (71.48±6.22), (0.75±0.09) m/s, and (206.37±34.45) IU/L, respectively, 4 weeks after training, and those in the control group were (68.59±5.39) °, (0.62±0.22) m/s, and (181.06±39.74) IU/L, respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (t=2.303, 3.586, 3.156, all P<0.05). There were significant differences in respiratory symptoms, mobility, disease impact scores, and total scores between the two groups (all P<0.05). Conclusion Centrifugal exercise training for patients with stable COPD is beneficial to improve their exercise ability and cardiopulmonary endurance, accelerate rehabilitation, and improve their quality of life.

Key words： Pulmonary disease, Chronic obstructive Exercise therapy Exercise test Lung function

收稿日期: 2023-02-20

ZTFLH:

R493

作者简介: 陈才煌(1984—),男,福建永定人,主治医师,本科,主要从事呼吸内科工作。

引用本文:

陈才煌,吴志刚. 离心运动与空中踏车加腹式呼吸训练对稳定期COPD患者运动能力和心肺耐力影响的比较研究[J]. 中国校医, 2023, 37(12): 914-918.
CHEN Caihuang, WU Zhigang. Comparative study of effects of centrifugal exercise and air treadmill combined with abdominal breathing training on exercise ability and cardiopulmonary endurance in stable COPD patients. Chinese Journal of School Doctor, 2023, 37(12): 914-918.

链接本文:

https://www.zgxyzz.org.cn/CN/ 或 https://www.zgxyzz.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V37/I12/914

[1] Wang C,Xu J,Yang L,et al. Prevalence and risk factors of chronicobstructive pulmonary disease in China (the China PulmonaryHealth [CPH] study): a national cross-sectional study[J]. Lancet.2018 ,391(10131):1706-1717.
[2] 臧巧英,余露,梁蕊,等.心理康复在慢性阻塞性肺疾病治疗中的研究进展[J].国际呼吸杂志,2021,41(7):556-560.
[3] 张海云,何英姿,张萍,等.腹式呼吸、有氧训练联合抗阻运动在老年稳定期COPD患者肺功能康复中的应用[J].川北医学院学报,2019,34(2):266-269.
[4] 李谷峰,吴坚,李凌,等.体外冲击波联合离心运动训练对髌股疼痛综合征患者的临床运用分析[J].河北医学,2022,28(11):1873-1878.
[5] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会慢性阻塞性肺疾病学组.慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊治指南(2007年修订版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2007,30(1):8-17.
[6] Meng NH,Chen FN,Lo SF,et al. Reliability and validity of theTaiwan (Mandarin Chinese) version of the chronic respiratoryquestionnaire[J]. Qual Life Res,2011,20(10):1745-51.
[7] 王祯,雷槟恺,于亮,等.急性离心运动后恢复期大鼠骨骼肌微管形态及自噬体降解特征研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2022,37(2):148-154.
[8] 刘秀娟,张念云,王斌,等.脂肪间充质干细胞注射对离心运动大鼠肌肉修复中肌肉抑制素信号通路的影响机制[J].中国康复医学杂志,2021,36(1):16-22.
[9] 王珺.最大等速离心运动诱发肌肉损伤程度与肌酸激酶水平的关系[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2020,39(1):423-428.
[10] 石颖,秦金东.蛋白和抗氧化剂对离心运动后肌肉功能和疼痛的影响[J].基因组学与应用生物学,2020,39(5):2266-2272.
[11] 李晓.骨质疏松治疗仪结合等速离心运动治疗膝骨性关节炎的临床观察[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2022,47(1):47-49,54.
[12] 王正,左玉强,王晓彤,等.家用呼吸训练器在稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复中的应用[J].国际呼吸杂志,2021,41(7):505-510.
[13] 史姗姗,庞伟.离心运动训练在康复治疗中的应用进展[J].中国康复理论与实践,2018,24(2):173-178.
[14] 彭杰,罗炯,宋刚.离心收缩运动训练延缓机体老化:正向效益存在的问题[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(11):1774-1780.
[15] 刘阳,何玉秀,梅家顺.相同摄氧量下向心运动和离心运动对脂代谢肌肉因子激活作用的对比研究[J].中国运动医学杂志,2018,37(12):1024-1031.
[16] 王正,左玉强,王晓彤,等.家用呼吸训练器在稳定期慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复中的应用[J].国际呼吸杂志,2021,41(7):505-510.
[17] 刘赟.快、慢两种速度下最大等速离心运动训练对伸膝肌群的影响[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(31):4962-4968.
[18] 陈元菁,艾红军,王湘云,等.COPD患者线粒体功能及代谢水平变化检测与骨骼肌功能障碍的相关性研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2020,35(6):25-27,32.
[19] 覃松梅,邓艺新,刘航,等.6 min步行试验和评分量表评估COPD的预后[J].临床与病理杂志,2021,41(10):2395-2399.
[20] 何子凡,顾钰霞,曾海珠,等.下肢等速肌力训练对中重度COPD患者运动能力和生活质量的影响[J].国际呼吸杂志,2021,41(4):241-246.